<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LiveJournal shuts down Scans Daily community [Update]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/</link>
	<description>Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:59:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KET</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>KET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ve encountered at least as many people that kick the comic buying habit through the help of Scans Daily as I’ve encountered people that claim the forum led them to buy more product.&quot;

Then you simply heven&#039;t encountered enough people, Huxford. From merely making a casual scan of the &#039;net over the last couple of days, I&#039;d say the ratio seems closer to 80/10 in FAVOR of readers using the forum to make comic book purchasing decisions. And more than half of the other 10% seem to be more of the snarky uninformed, who weren&#039;t really actively engaging with the site to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I’ve encountered at least as many people that kick the comic buying habit through the help of Scans Daily as I’ve encountered people that claim the forum led them to buy more product."</p>
<p>Then you simply heven't encountered enough people, Huxford. From merely making a casual scan of the 'net over the last couple of days, I'd say the ratio seems closer to 80/10 in FAVOR of readers using the forum to make comic book purchasing decisions. And more than half of the other 10% seem to be more of the snarky uninformed, who weren't really actively engaging with the site to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Huxford</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6674</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Huxford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6674</guid>
		<description>In a market where a sizable number of customers seem to purchase more out of an addiction-like need to know what happens to characters they grew up reading (more than appreciation of a quality story), I don&#039;t think the Big Two can ignore a site that gives away major developments and important chunks of their product on a regular basis without any publisher control. 

I&#039;ve encountered at least as many people that kick the comic buying habit through the help of Scans Daily as I&#039;ve encountered people that claim the forum led them to buy more product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a market where a sizable number of customers seem to purchase more out of an addiction-like need to know what happens to characters they grew up reading (more than appreciation of a quality story), I don't think the Big Two can ignore a site that gives away major developments and important chunks of their product on a regular basis without any publisher control. </p>
<p>I've encountered at least as many people that kick the comic buying habit through the help of Scans Daily as I've encountered people that claim the forum led them to buy more product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minamino Haruka</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6647</link>
		<dc:creator>Minamino Haruka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6647</guid>
		<description>I bet it was Brian or a similar soul who filed the complaint versus scans_daily. I sense much bitterness (over not having been accepted as a comic book writer/artist perhaps? Over not being published at all in any form maybe?) in his posts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet it was Brian or a similar soul who filed the complaint versus scans_daily. I sense much bitterness (over not having been accepted as a comic book writer/artist perhaps? Over not being published at all in any form maybe?) in his posts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>There are so many reasons scans_daily was beneficial to Marvel and other comics companies, that it seems like they did themselves a major disservice by pulling the plug on it.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I understand copyright law (as an entertainment lawyer) and am a firm supporter of the owner&#039;s right to control the use. But there comes a point when good business sense really could or should play a part in the decision of what to pursue in this arena. And one key part of copyright is that the owner *gets to decide* the use. So Marvel COULD have decided that scans_daily could exist. Perhaps they could have contacted the maintainers (who are just people who enjoy comics, not some evil group trying to scam the industry) to see if an agreement on posting rules could be reached. After all, most LJ comms already have maintainer-enforced rules.

Why was this the wrong reaction for Marvel, in my view?

For one, this does not make Marvel look like a company that understands or works with their fanbase. It makes them look like they had a knee-jerk legal department reaction to any use of copyright without considering what the use was. The comics companies always seem to be saying they want to know what their readers want, because they want to satisfy fans, and, in the end, sell more issues - well, THIS was something their readers wanted. And they didn&#039;t consider that.

For another, many used the community to find new comics, decide whether they wanted to read a series, or point others in the direction of a series. I personally greatly expanded my collection after glancing over some Deadpool comic excerpts in the community (to the tune of ALL EIGHT Cable &amp; Deadpool TPBs, and also some Iron Man and Spider-man) and pointed at least 2 others towards Cable &amp; Deadpool (at least one of whom I know is buying up the TPBs now). I never refrained from buying a comic I would otherwise have purchased because of the community - but I DID buy comics I&#039;d never have heard of after seeing them there.

Another great thing was the sense of community - you could ask a question about the continuity, or some trivia, or where to find a storyline in the issues, and people there would know and answer. Everyone was having a good time, enjoying something together. That kind of thing also leads to more comics fans, which equals more books bought. Again: good for Marvel.

And then there&#039;s the small, bitter taste left in my mouth when I think of the great amount of effort people put into sharing their favorite comics or explaining why a run was so great, which is all lost now, along with the ability to quickly click and reference something archived there to talk about in a blog post or send to a friend.

It&#039;s a big loss to comics discussion and community. What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many reasons scans_daily was beneficial to Marvel and other comics companies, that it seems like they did themselves a major disservice by pulling the plug on it.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong - I understand copyright law (as an entertainment lawyer) and am a firm supporter of the owner's right to control the use. But there comes a point when good business sense really could or should play a part in the decision of what to pursue in this arena. And one key part of copyright is that the owner *gets to decide* the use. So Marvel COULD have decided that scans_daily could exist. Perhaps they could have contacted the maintainers (who are just people who enjoy comics, not some evil group trying to scam the industry) to see if an agreement on posting rules could be reached. After all, most LJ comms already have maintainer-enforced rules.</p>
<p>Why was this the wrong reaction for Marvel, in my view?</p>
<p>For one, this does not make Marvel look like a company that understands or works with their fanbase. It makes them look like they had a knee-jerk legal department reaction to any use of copyright without considering what the use was. The comics companies always seem to be saying they want to know what their readers want, because they want to satisfy fans, and, in the end, sell more issues - well, THIS was something their readers wanted. And they didn't consider that.</p>
<p>For another, many used the community to find new comics, decide whether they wanted to read a series, or point others in the direction of a series. I personally greatly expanded my collection after glancing over some Deadpool comic excerpts in the community (to the tune of ALL EIGHT Cable &amp; Deadpool TPBs, and also some Iron Man and Spider-man) and pointed at least 2 others towards Cable &amp; Deadpool (at least one of whom I know is buying up the TPBs now). I never refrained from buying a comic I would otherwise have purchased because of the community - but I DID buy comics I'd never have heard of after seeing them there.</p>
<p>Another great thing was the sense of community - you could ask a question about the continuity, or some trivia, or where to find a storyline in the issues, and people there would know and answer. Everyone was having a good time, enjoying something together. That kind of thing also leads to more comics fans, which equals more books bought. Again: good for Marvel.</p>
<p>And then there's the small, bitter taste left in my mouth when I think of the great amount of effort people put into sharing their favorite comics or explaining why a run was so great, which is all lost now, along with the ability to quickly click and reference something archived there to talk about in a blog post or send to a friend.</p>
<p>It's a big loss to comics discussion and community. What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drastic_quench</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator>drastic_quench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6634</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a damn shame.  I bought a fair amount of books I wouldn&#039;t have otherwise been exposed to without scans_daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's a damn shame.  I bought a fair amount of books I wouldn't have otherwise been exposed to without scans_daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrideb</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrideb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6538</guid>
		<description>Scans_daily introduced me to several titles which I went on to buy.  I found the atmosphere there friendly, even when people disagreed with each other.  Without scans_daily, I&#039;m not sure where to commune with comic fans, because that community was unique, as far as I know.  I never had to stand by myself to make a point about sexism or homophobia in comics, or be afraid of being dismissed as an  &#039;overly sensitive girl&#039;.  And yes, I&#039;ve seen that phrase in other comic forums.

I do think without a place to share, I won&#039;t be buying as many comics.  A big part of the fun is sharing with other fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scans_daily introduced me to several titles which I went on to buy.  I found the atmosphere there friendly, even when people disagreed with each other.  Without scans_daily, I'm not sure where to commune with comic fans, because that community was unique, as far as I know.  I never had to stand by myself to make a point about sexism or homophobia in comics, or be afraid of being dismissed as an  'overly sensitive girl'.  And yes, I've seen that phrase in other comic forums.</p>
<p>I do think without a place to share, I won't be buying as many comics.  A big part of the fun is sharing with other fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lampbane</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator>Lampbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6535</guid>
		<description>On scans_daily there were people who liked to piss on everything, but in contrast there were also people who would gush over the very same things. It was a pretty diverse set of opinions in many cases, and you could usually find someone who agrees with you.

scans_daily was great for minority opinions, especially when it came to things women liked. You always hear about women in refrigerators in superhero comics, but you rarely ever hear about the things that superhero comics did right when it came to women. And not just having strong female characters or sensibly-dressed women with small boobs - but the less obvious stuff. Relationships. Not just romantic relationships, but friendship, platonic, father-son, and families. As a woman, I love that stuff, and so did much of scans_daily (it was a slash community to start, after all). 

Like many, I bought stuff due to scans_daily. People showcased stuff they liked and I became interested, especially a lot of older stuff that&#039;s only in reprints (or not reprinted). Companies don&#039;t really showcase their older stuff - you certainly won&#039;t hear Marvel say boo about their older Black Panther stuff, not with Hudlin and his version out there. And DC has many titles that they have no interest in reprinting - and I even asked about a few titles (Chase, 90&#039;s Green Arrow) at NYCC, and the editor told me I should just go buy the back issues on the show floor. In a way, scans_daily was good at creating an archive of older stuff, a way for people to catch up on the past so you could better enjoy the present issues.

As for the new stuff posted on scans_daily? Sometimes it seemed like people posted just to get a lot of comments, without really adding anything to the scans they posted. And that&#039;s a shame, and that is one of the things that really screwed scans_daily. But there certainly were people who bought new issues based on seeing an excerpt on scans_daily. There were also people who used it to keep up with recent titles without having to buy them, so maybe the two canceled each other out, but more likely those people weren&#039;t going to buy the title either way (it&#039;s the same principle that people failed to see with Napster - just because I downloaded Nena&#039;s 99 Luftballoons for free doesn&#039;t mean I would have paid for it if I had to - I would just go without the song instead).

Ultimately, scans_daily let some creators interact with fans, it let female fans find other women with the same interests, and it brought attention to a lot of stuff that would normally go ignored, and mostly, it was just harmless. If you didn&#039;t like it, you didn&#039;t have to read it. If you did like it, then it&#039;s a real shame that it&#039;s gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On scans_daily there were people who liked to piss on everything, but in contrast there were also people who would gush over the very same things. It was a pretty diverse set of opinions in many cases, and you could usually find someone who agrees with you.</p>
<p>scans_daily was great for minority opinions, especially when it came to things women liked. You always hear about women in refrigerators in superhero comics, but you rarely ever hear about the things that superhero comics did right when it came to women. And not just having strong female characters or sensibly-dressed women with small boobs - but the less obvious stuff. Relationships. Not just romantic relationships, but friendship, platonic, father-son, and families. As a woman, I love that stuff, and so did much of scans_daily (it was a slash community to start, after all). </p>
<p>Like many, I bought stuff due to scans_daily. People showcased stuff they liked and I became interested, especially a lot of older stuff that's only in reprints (or not reprinted). Companies don't really showcase their older stuff - you certainly won't hear Marvel say boo about their older Black Panther stuff, not with Hudlin and his version out there. And DC has many titles that they have no interest in reprinting - and I even asked about a few titles (Chase, 90's Green Arrow) at NYCC, and the editor told me I should just go buy the back issues on the show floor. In a way, scans_daily was good at creating an archive of older stuff, a way for people to catch up on the past so you could better enjoy the present issues.</p>
<p>As for the new stuff posted on scans_daily? Sometimes it seemed like people posted just to get a lot of comments, without really adding anything to the scans they posted. And that's a shame, and that is one of the things that really screwed scans_daily. But there certainly were people who bought new issues based on seeing an excerpt on scans_daily. There were also people who used it to keep up with recent titles without having to buy them, so maybe the two canceled each other out, but more likely those people weren't going to buy the title either way (it's the same principle that people failed to see with Napster - just because I downloaded Nena's 99 Luftballoons for free doesn't mean I would have paid for it if I had to - I would just go without the song instead).</p>
<p>Ultimately, scans_daily let some creators interact with fans, it let female fans find other women with the same interests, and it brought attention to a lot of stuff that would normally go ignored, and mostly, it was just harmless. If you didn't like it, you didn't have to read it. If you did like it, then it's a real shame that it's gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen Anthai</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen Anthai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;it will be the same endless self-important wankery from a bunch of wannabe-fan-fiction writers congratulating one another about how clever they are.&lt;/I&gt;

Oh, COME now. Bluefall is one of the most literate and articulate people on LJ, and always presented her opinions in a well-thought-out matter. Even when I disagreed with her opinions, which was more than a few times, I was always interested in hearing what she had to say.

As for Foxhack, it&#039;s just not S_D without &quot;LAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNDD!&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it will be the same endless self-important wankery from a bunch of wannabe-fan-fiction writers congratulating one another about how clever they are.</i></p>
<p>Oh, COME now. Bluefall is one of the most literate and articulate people on LJ, and always presented her opinions in a well-thought-out matter. Even when I disagreed with her opinions, which was more than a few times, I was always interested in hearing what she had to say.</p>
<p>As for Foxhack, it's just not S_D without "LAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNDD!" <img src='http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bariman1987</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6526</link>
		<dc:creator>Bariman1987</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6526</guid>
		<description>@Brian
I disagree.   I was a frequent poster at S_D, and have several hundred dollars worth of trade paperbacks that I would NOT have bought without the community.  I bought stuff such as (in no particular order) Blue Beetle, JSA, Ultimate Spider-Man, Marvel Adventures, Welcome to Tranquility, and Astro City because members of S_D thought those books were good and posted scans and commentary as to why.  There were plenty of other people on the comm who bought books for those reasons as well.  So S_D had a rather large chance of getting new buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian<br />
I disagree.   I was a frequent poster at S_D, and have several hundred dollars worth of trade paperbacks that I would NOT have bought without the community.  I bought stuff such as (in no particular order) Blue Beetle, JSA, Ultimate Spider-Man, Marvel Adventures, Welcome to Tranquility, and Astro City because members of S_D thought those books were good and posted scans and commentary as to why.  There were plenty of other people on the comm who bought books for those reasons as well.  So S_D had a rather large chance of getting new buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Norris</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/02/livejournal-shuts-down-scans-daily-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=4898#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>Just by the general atmosphere at LiveJournal over the last couple of years, this can&#039;t be the least bit of a surprise; I don&#039;t see why plans weren&#039;t made to move s_d ages ago, why noscans is still using LJ, or why indeed everyone hasn&#039;t given up on LJ and bailed on the place ages ago.
It was just a matter of time, but they just sat there on LJ, oblivious, waiting for the hammer to come down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just by the general atmosphere at LiveJournal over the last couple of years, this can't be the least bit of a surprise; I don't see why plans weren't made to move s_d ages ago, why noscans is still using LJ, or why indeed everyone hasn't given up on LJ and bailed on the place ages ago.<br />
It was just a matter of time, but they just sat there on LJ, oblivious, waiting for the hammer to come down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
