Comments on: D’oh!: Marge Simpson poses for Playboy

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:28:46 +0000

See the pictures now at thatswag com/marge

D. Peace — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:06:11 +0000

If you think that’s hideous, sad and bizarre, (and Christ help you if you don’t) wait til you see Dilbert’s pictorial in PLAYGIRL.

El Santo — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:23:00 +0000

Ah, just what Playboy readers need: a cover that makes them even MORE embarrassed for flipping through Playboy at the local news stand.

Seriously, this looks like that ridiculous cartoon porn you accidentally google when you have the SafeSearch off.

Flip Maker — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:03:46 +0000

At least it’s not difficult finding the hidden Playboy logo in this cover.

That’s about the best thing I can say about this. SO lame.

Cisco Kid — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:11:29 +0000

*shudder*

I was 8 when the Simpsons debuted on television. This is like looking at my mom.

Sounds like a desperate gasp for attention from a dying magazine.

Rikk Odinson — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:56:36 +0000

A drawing of a fake chick covering a book of photoshopped chicks with fake body parts.

Sublime.

Simon DelMonte — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:29:33 +0000

Hey, new Stephen King fiction.

What? I read it for the articles.

Juan Navarro — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:44:52 +0000

You know the worst part?

I think it moved.

Mark H. — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:23:21 +0000

First the post office and now Playboy, what’s the world coming to?

Joe — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:17:40 +0000

First thing that comes to MY mind when looking for masturbatory material is Simpsons porn. I just love that sexy flat yellow skin.

Matt Ampersand — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:16:08 +0000

Wow, Playboy must be really hurting for readers.

Ortiz — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:05:14 +0000

What about the children?! Won’t somebody please think of the children!?

Nuff’ said.

Peace.