<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Meta-List returns: The 100 Best Comics of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/the-meta-list-returns-the-100-best-comics-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/the-meta-list-returns-the-100-best-comics-of-2008/</link>
	<description>Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/the-meta-list-returns-the-100-best-comics-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17658</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=24204#comment-17658</guid>
		<description>I should also point out that the point system also rewards books that appeared on only a few lists but were highly ranked on those lists; the bottom end of the meta-list has a few books that only appeared on one or two lists.

If there is a better way to quantify the lists, I&#039;d be open to considering it.  I think the list (at least the first half) is a fairly accurate aggregation of the critical consensus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also point out that the point system also rewards books that appeared on only a few lists but were highly ranked on those lists; the bottom end of the meta-list has a few books that only appeared on one or two lists.</p>
<p>If there is a better way to quantify the lists, I&#8217;d be open to considering it.  I think the list (at least the first half) is a fairly accurate aggregation of the critical consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/10/the-meta-list-returns-the-100-best-comics-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17656</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/?p=24204#comment-17656</guid>
		<description>Glad to oblige.  And I&#039;m planning on running a follow-up post that shows the number of lists that each book appeared on.  As for Bottomless Belly Button, it pretty much killed in both number of lists and ranking.  It appeared on 31 lists in total.  15 of those lists were unnumbered.  Of the other 16 lists, here was BBB&#039;s ranking: 4,9,2,4,1,2,12,2,3,3,4,3,1,1,4,1.  Not too shabby, which explains why it&#039;s the runaway winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to oblige.  And I&#8217;m planning on running a follow-up post that shows the number of lists that each book appeared on.  As for Bottomless Belly Button, it pretty much killed in both number of lists and ranking.  It appeared on 31 lists in total.  15 of those lists were unnumbered.  Of the other 16 lists, here was BBB&#8217;s ranking: 4,9,2,4,1,2,12,2,3,3,4,3,1,1,4,1.  Not too shabby, which explains why it&#8217;s the runaway winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

