Comments on: Comics A.M. | The comics Internet in two minutes

By: Gaz

Gaz — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:02:24 +0000

>>Sankaku complax

I lose a bit of my soul everytime i click on that pedotrash pseudo-news site.

By: Alan Coil

Alan Coil — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:45:04 +0000

Thad —

No argument on that point. Stupid is as stupid does.

By: Blackjak

Blackjak — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:32:56 +0000

Thad, considering the Tabloid that printed the complaint, I’d go with the latter…

By: Thad

Thad — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:02:27 +0000

@Alan Coil: true, but there’s plenty of blame to go around. One of the critics actually used the argument that “‘comic’ means ‘funny’”; she was either trolling or legitimately very stupid.

By: Kirk Warren

Kirk Warren — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:44:35 +0000

Oh, and the actual content of hte link is fine, but the site and ads/banners it has featuers a lot of NSFW content. The manga topic was perfectly fine.

By: Kirk Warren

Kirk Warren — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:43:48 +0000

You may want to put a NSFW tag on the Sankaku Complex link.

By: Alan Coil

Alan Coil — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:32:27 +0000

In the article about the Princess Diana comic book, Darren G. Davis said: “This is a book about female empowerment.”

Well, maybe that is what he is saying, but nobody believes that.

Geoff Boucher wrote in the article: “Davis seemed genuinely hurt by the suggestion that his company was trying to make a lurid fast buck with the book,…”

The purpose of a business is to make a fast buck. Many fast bucks. Trading on the celebrity of dead people is indeed lurid. If Davis is being hurt by that description, I’d suggest he grow a thicker skin.