Brad Meltzer remakes history in ‘Detective Comics’ #27
Over the past few years, Brad Meltzer has become one of the pinch hitters of comics.
Although his day job as a bestselling suspense novelist and TV host of History’s Decoded has kept him from taking on an extended comics project since 2006′s Justice League of America relaunch, Meltzer has stepped in for a number of comics projects over recent years, including an arc on Joss Whedon’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 8 and a recent short in Art Baltazar and Franco’s Aw Yeah Comics.
Next up for the writer is a special contribution to DC Comics’ Detective Comics #27, arriving next week. The spiritual heir to the first appearance of Batman will clock in at more than 100 pages to kick off DC’s 75th anniversary celebration for the Dark Knight, with contributions by Scott Snyder, John Layman, Mike W. Barr and more creators from the character’s past and present. And for his part, Meltzer will team with artist Bryan Hitch to retell “The Case of the Chemical Syndicate,” the Bill Finger/Bob Kane short that began the Batman legend in 1939’s Detective Comics #27.
We spoke with Meltzer about the legacy of the original story and the challenges of bringing it into the modern era – and not for the first time – while DC shared an exclusive first look at Co-Publisher Jim Lee’s variant cover for the issue.
Robot 6: Brad, I talked to Mike Marts after this Detective #27 issue was announced, and it seemed like he cast a wide net to get anyone on board to do anything. When they approached you, did you immediately gravitate toward revisiting the original?
Brad Meltzer: As with all things in comics from my past decade at DC, I blame Dan DiDio for this. God bless him, for years now we’ve been talking and scheming to try and find the right project to work together again. We went down one road for a while, and then when Decoded came on the air, I had to drop out. Then we were talking about something else, and since I’m not doing kids’ books I had to drop out. The timing just became too hard for me to do things, and he said, “Here, I have one for you.” And he knew this was my weakness because Batman is the pinnacle for me. We’ve always been talking about that, and he said that since it was the 75th anniversary of Batman, they wanted to honor that first story. To me, that’s something you can’t pass on.
Do you have a memory of the first time you read the original story? Because when I was young, I had a copy of Detective #627, which not only reprinted that short but also had versions from the ’60s as well as contemporary ones …
And they all redid it! Yeah, the trick has been done before. The funny part is that I can’t tell you when I first read it. I don’t know. I’m pretty sure it was one of the ones I read later – far later when I was an adult but not when I was a kid going, “Oh my gosh! I’ve been inspired ever since.” But when you look at that original, it’s kind of wild because comics were told so differently then. There were 12 panels on a page, and every character spouts all their motivations in a single word balloon. The scene opens up, and it’s “Commissioner, someone’s dead!” and then Commissioner Gordon goes, “Well, Bruce Wayne, do you want to come with me to the murder scene even though there’s no logical reason for you to be there?” And Bruce Wayne says, “Sure I will!” [Laughs] It all just races on from there.
To me, I think when you say that we’re “retelling” the first Batman story, it’s almost doing a disservice. It’s like we’re colorizing an old movie. You can do it, and you can modernize it, but it’s sort of robbing it of its soul. So what we wanted to do was honor the old story – to keep it in tact as much as we could. Then we could lay something new on top of it, so what you’ll see when you read this is that I tried to lay 75 years of Batman’s motivation on top of it. For me, when you look at the original story, the most beautiful part of it is that all the pieces are already there. He may not use the utility belt, but there it is. He may not like Commissioner Gordon, but there he is. All those little details and that stubbornness and determination is front and center.
And it’s amazing to see some of the other things in that first issue. Batman pushes someone into acid! Or maybe I should say that the bad guy falls into acid. I almost forgot that detail at the end of it.
I think too there are a lot of little elements over the years that have become undeniable pieces of the Batman canon: the pearls hitting the sidewalk when his parents are killed, or the bell he uses to summon Alfred but gets a bat. Did you find there were any later elements that you thought of as so essential that you wanted to work them in?
Yeah, of course. You can see right in there that the way Batman gets out of the death trap in the very first story is because he races in with his full costume, and when he gets locked inside this trap, the reason he gets out is because as he was racing inside he went “Oh look, there’s a wrench” and grabbed it. [Laughs] Batman would have 15 wrenches in his utility belt! That’s what it’s there for – to get you out of death traps. So that detail isn’t there. It’s clear in the original story that the utility belt is just on him because it looks cool. Bill Finger and Bob Kane knew how to do that, God bless them.
So for me, the interesting thing here was to see just how much got pulled in over the years. It’s kind of like how Superman learned how to fly in a cartoon, and then it makes the comics. It all kind of influences itself, and that’s not a weakness. That’s the beauty of this mythology. It’s been a living, breathing thing for 75 years, and all these different hands from Bill Finger and Bob Kane to everyone else who’s gotten to touch it has added and tweaked and massaged it into this perfect structure. It’s why the character is here 75 years later and is so perfectly defined. You can put him up against Superman, Wolverine, Spider-Man, Captain America or anybody. No character in comics is more perfectly defined than Batman. No one. And that definition is as pointy as the ears itself.